Body Scans or Pat Downs at the Airport?
photo uploaded by publik16.
It’s probably no secret to you that the body scanners are coming to an airport near you…..
After trial runs at several airports such as Amsterdam, Moscow, Manchester, New York City and Kelowna, more airports are installing the controversial scanners that can see through your clothes.
The machines, which produce a three-dimensional outline of a person’s naked body, would only be used when a secondary screening in required. According to Canada’s Privacy Commissioner, the individual viewing the scan would not see the person’s face in the line-up and there are safeguards to delete the image immediately after the person leaves the portal.
But a sense of invasion still exists and to alleviate this concern, people singled out for this extra screening would have the choice of the full-body scan or the pat down.
As someone who has a metal plate and 16 pins in her leg (from a car accident), I ALWAYS get pulled over for the secondary screening. For me this is not a case of “if” I have to do a secondary screen, it is “when” I have to do the secondary screen. The pat downs are embarrassing, but am I looking forward to being xrayed instead? No!
Having said that, new things can be scary. With time and evidence that some pervy security guy is not sitting in a room with his cell phone taking photos of the scans and posting them on his Twitter account, maybe then I will choose the scans over the pat downs.
What about you? What are your thoughts on the Body Scans vs Pat Downs issue?


Recent Comments